• Blog
  • Legacy Application Refactoring

Legacy Application Refactoring

How does Application Refactoring Work?

Publish date:
Discover more of what matters to you

What is Application Refactoring?

Application refactoring is the process of restructuring existing computer code, without changing its external behavior, to improve its readability, maintainability, and/or performance. Refactoring applications typically involves making small, incremental changes to the codebase, with the goal of enhancing its overall quality without altering its functionality.

Common techniques used in application refactoring include extracting methods, renaming variables, eliminating duplicate code, simplifying conditional expressions, and breaking down large functions into smaller, more manageable pieces. Refactoring applications is often an integral part of the software development process, performed iteratively as part of ongoing maintenance and improvement efforts.

Cloud Migration Refactoring

Cloud refactoring refers to the process of modifying existing applications or systems to optimize them for cloud environments during the migration process. When organizations move their applications and infrastructure to the cloud, they often need to make adjustments to fully leverage the benefits of cloud computing, such as scalability, elasticity, reliability, and cost-effectiveness.

Overall, cloud refactoring is a critical step in the process of moving applications to the cloud, enabling organizations to fully leverage the benefits of cloud computing while ensuring optimal performance, scalability, cost-effectiveness, security, and compliance.

Database refactoring

Database refactoring is the process of restructuring an existing database schema in order to improve its design, organization, performance, and maintainability without changing its external behavior. It is a crucial aspect of database management, especially in evolving software systems where database requirements change over time.

Database refactoring should be approached cautiously to minimize the risk of data loss or disruption to existing applications. It often involves careful planning, testing, and coordination with development teams to ensure that changes are properly implemented and validated. Additionally, version control and backup mechanisms should be in place to mitigate any potential risks associated with database refactoring.

User Interface Refactoring

User interface (UI) refactoring refers to the process of redesigning and restructuring the user interface of a software application to improve its usability, aesthetics, and overall user experience without altering its core functionality. UI refactoring is often undertaken to address usability issues, enhance visual design, optimize workflow, and align the interface with evolving user expectations and design trends.

UI refactoring should be approached iteratively, with careful consideration of user needs, design principles, and technical constraints. It often requires collaboration between designers, developers, and stakeholders to ensure that the redesigned interface meets both user requirements and business objectives. Testing and validation are essential to ensure that the refactored UI meets usability standards and enhances the overall user experience.

Legacy Code Refactoring Guide
Check out our article
Check out

How does Application Refactoring Work?

Application refactoring typically follows a systematic process that involves analyzing the existing codebase, identifying areas for improvement, making changes to the code, and validating the changes to ensure they do not introduce new issues. Here’s a general overview of how application refactoring works:

  • Analysis and Planning:
    • Understand the existing codebase: Analyze the structure, architecture, and quality of the existing code to identify areas that need improvement.
    • Define refactoring applications goals: Determine the objectives of the refactoring effort, such as improving maintainability, enhancing performance, or addressing technical debt.
    • Assess risks and dependencies: Identify potential risks and dependencies associated with refactoring, such as impact on other parts of the application or compatibility with third-party libraries.
  • Identifying Refactoring Opportunities:
    • Identify code smells: Look for common signs of poor code quality, such as duplication, long methods, complex conditional logic, and inconsistent naming conventions.
    • Use automated tools: Utilize code analysis tools and IDE features to identify potential refactoring applications opportunities automatically.
    • Gather feedback: Solicit feedback from developers, testers, and other stakeholders to identify pain points and areas for improvement in the codebase.
  • Refactoring Techniques:
    • Select appropriate refactoring techniques: Choose from a variety of refactoring techniques, such as extracting methods, renaming variables, simplifying conditional logic, and removing duplication.
    • Apply refactoring patterns: Use established refactoring patterns and best practices to guide the restructuring process and ensure consistency across the codebase.
    • Ensure backward compatibility: Refactor the code in a way that maintains backward compatibility with existing functionality and interfaces.
  • Implementing Changes:
    • Make incremental changes: Refactor the code in small, incremental steps to minimize the risk of introducing errors and make it easier to track changes.
    • Write tests: Create automated tests to verify the behavior of the refactored code and ensure that existing functionality remains intact.
    • Refactor safely: Use version control systems to track changes and revert back to previous versions if necessary. Apply refactoring techniques safely to avoid introducing new bugs or breaking existing functionality.
  • Validation and Testing:
    • Validate changes: Test the refactored code thoroughly to ensure that it behaves as expected and meets the defined objectives.
    • Regression testing: Conduct regression testing to verify that existing functionality has not been affected by the refactoring applications changes.
    • Performance testing: Measure the performance impact of the refactoring changes to ensure that they have achieved the desired performance improvements.
  • Iterative Improvement:
    • Iterate as needed: Refactoring applications is an iterative process, so continue to monitor the codebase, gather feedback, and identify additional opportunities for improvement.
    • Continuous improvement: Incorporate refactoring into the software development lifecycle as an ongoing practice to maintain code quality and agility over time.

By following these steps, application refactoring helps improve the quality, maintainability, and performance of software applications while minimizing the risk of introducing errors or disrupting existing functionality.

Common Code Refactoring Methods

Code refactoring involves restructuring existing code without changing its external behavior to improve readability, maintainability, and performance. There are numerous refactoring methods, each targeting specific aspects of code quality.

Refactoring applications from Red to Green (RGR)

Refactoring from Red to Green (RGR) is a software development approach closely associated with Test-Driven Development (TDD). In TDD, developers follow a cycle known as the “Red-Green-Refactor” cycle, which consists of the following steps:

  1. Red: Write a failing test.
  2. Green: Write the minimum amount of code necessary to make the test pass.
  3. Refactor: Improve the code without changing its external behavior.

Refactoring from Red to Green (RGR) specifically focuses on the third step of the TDD cycle, which is refactoring. After writing a failing test (Red) and then implementing the simplest solution to make the test pass (Green), developers proceed to refactor the code to improve its design, readability, and maintainability, all while ensuring that the test continues to pass.


If you are working on a large project with a lot of code that needs to be refactored, consider the abstraction technique. Abstraction techniques help reduce large chunks of code while eliminating duplication.

Classes are merged into a superclass or dropped to a subclass using the Pull-Up/Pull-Down method. The advantage of this technique is that the system can be released even while changes are being made. 


The composition method, which includes extraction and inline methods, is used to find and extract fragments from complex and obscure codes. The composition method helps to shorten the code to eliminate duplication and create a more compact and neat code. The fragmented code is then replaced by calling a new method. The extraction method includes features such as class, interface, and local variables.


The goal of this method is to make the code less complex and easy to read. Inherited codes become confusing over time. By changing the relationships between classes, naming or removing certain parameters, you simplify the logic in these codes. Simplification can take many forms, such as combining conditional fragments and expressions.

Moving Features Between Objects

New classes are created to implement this method, and functionality is transferred between the old and new classes.

This is mostly a function transfer when a class is overloaded with too many responsibilities, or when the class does not meet the requirements of the program.

Why is Application Refactoring Important?

Application refactoring is important for several reasons:

  • Code Quality Improvement: Refactoring helps improve the quality of code by eliminating code smells, reducing complexity, and adhering to coding best practices. This leads to code that is easier to understand, maintain, and extend.
  • Maintainability Enhancement: Refactoring makes codebases more maintainable by restructuring code in a way that makes it easier to navigate, modify, and debug. This reduces the time and effort required for ongoing maintenance tasks.
  • Performance Optimization: Refactoring can also improve the performance of applications by optimizing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage. This leads to applications that are more responsive and efficient, resulting in better user experiences.
  • Bug Reduction: Refactoring helps reduce the likelihood of introducing bugs and software defects by simplifying code and eliminating redundancy. This makes it easier to identify and fix issues during development and testing.
  • Technical Debt Reduction: Refactoring helps address technical debt by proactively improving code quality and addressing areas of accumulated complexity. This prevents technical debt from accumulating further and makes it easier to manage existing technical debt over time.
  • Agility and Flexibility: Refactoring promotes agility and flexibility by making it easier to respond to changing requirements and evolving business needs. It allows applications to adapt more readily to new features, technologies, and market conditions.
  • Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: Refactoring encourages collaboration among team members by promoting clean, well-organized code that is easier to understand and work with. It also facilitates knowledge sharing by documenting design decisions and promoting consistent coding practices.
  • Cost Reduction: While refactoring requires an initial investment of time and effort, it can lead to cost savings in the long run by reducing the time and resources required for maintenance, debugging, and future development.

Overall, application refactoring is essential for maintaining the health and sustainability of software applications over time. By continuously improving code quality, maintainability, and performance, refactoring helps ensure that applications remain competitive, reliable, and adaptable in the face of changing requirements and technological advancements.

What are Limitations of Application Refactoring

While application refactoring offers numerous benefits, it also has its limitations and challenges:

  • Time and Resources: Refactoring can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially for large and complex codebases. It requires careful planning, implementation, and testing, which can impact project timelines and budgets.
  • Risk of Regression: Refactoring introduces the risk of introducing new bugs or regressions, especially if not done carefully or if adequate testing procedures are not in place. Changes to the codebase may inadvertently alter its behavior, leading to unintended consequences.
  • Legacy Systems: Refactoring legacy systems can be particularly challenging due to outdated technologies, lack of documentation, and dependencies on legacy code. Legacy systems may have accumulated technical debt over time, making refactoring more difficult and risky.
  • Compatibility Issues: Refactoring may introduce compatibility issues with other parts of the system or third-party dependencies. Changes to interfaces or behavior can impact how different components interact with each other, potentially causing disruptions or integration issues.
  • Lack of Automated Tests: Refactoring is more challenging without a comprehensive suite of automated tests. Without adequate test coverage, it’s difficult to ensure that refactored code behaves as expected and that existing functionality is not inadvertently broken.
  • Resistance to Change: Developers and stakeholders may resist refactoring due to concerns about disrupting existing functionality, perceived risks, or reluctance to invest time and resources in non-feature-related activities.
  • Scope Creep: Refactoring efforts may expand beyond their original scope, leading to “refactoring for the sake of refactoring” rather than focusing on tangible improvements in code quality or maintainability.
  • Over-refactoring: There is a risk of over-refactoring, where developers spend excessive time refactoring code that does not significantly impact overall system performance or maintainability. This can lead to diminishing returns and wasted effort.
  • Lack of Clear Guidelines: Without clear guidelines and criteria for prioritizing refactoring efforts, developers may struggle to determine which parts of the codebase should be refactored and when.

Despite these limitations, application refactoring remains a valuable practice for improving code quality, maintainability, and scalability over time. By carefully considering these challenges and adopting best practices, teams can mitigate risks and reap the benefits of refactoring in their software development projects.

When should you choose Application Refactoring?

Refactoring involves understanding how the code currently works. Developers should examine the code to understand its processes and methods before proceeding to modify the code, including not only what the code does, but also how it works.

The main goal of refactoring is not to fix bugs, but to fix design or implementation problems.

It’s also important to remember that refactoring is not just about new features and functionality, but also about trying to make code cleaner, easier to modify, more efficient, and better working.

If you have already made the decision to migrate your system and are looking for a reliable partner, check out our migration services.

Subscribe to our newsletter and get amazing content right in your inbox.

This field is required
This field is required Invalid email address
By submitting data, I agree to the Privacy Policy

Thank you for subscribing!
See you soon... in your inbox!

confirm your subscription, make sure to check your promotions/spam folder

Subscribe to our newsletter and get amazing content right in your inbox.

You can unsubscribe from the newsletter at any time

This field is required
This field is required Invalid email address

You're almost there...

A confirmation was sent to your email

confirm your subscription, make sure to check
your promotions/spam folder